![]() Even Rhea herself can help bring about reform on the Silver Snow route, as Edelgard's knowledge of Rhea's intentions and influence on Fódlan proves to be incomplete. At the end of her route, she ultimately does lead Fódlan into a Golden Age, but at the end of the routes that aren't hers, each new leader is also able to reform and usher Fódlan into a Golden Age via their own principles. What she's wrong about is that she is not the only one who can bring such changes. Additionally, her war is at least part of the reason why the eventual winner (whoever they end up being) is able to acquire enough power to make meaningful reforms to the status quo. were stagnating the entire continent and that change needed to happen. Ultimately, Edelgard is correct that Rhea's grip on Fódlan, plus the focus on nobility and the various Crest systems, etc. Usual suggested response will almost universally be to just delete the bolded section. I will generally be bolding the offending line. Notably, examples of this tend to be inserted into the middle of completely unrelated matters. Edelgard only very briefly alludes to her understanding of Rhea’s past with Nemesis, and her reason to fight is not because of the past but because of the suffering of Fodlan in the modern day. “ Edelgard doesn’t know the true history of Fodlan”: A recurring element of anti-Edelgard discourse is the assumption that she started a war against the Church of Seiros out of an incorrect understanding of Rhea’s history with Nemesis.I will generally be bolding the sections where it feels like the definition has devolved into an argument. Usual suggested response is to just clean it up and keep the important bits. “ Argument in the description”: When a description reads like an Edelgard fan and detractor (or visa-versa) have been taking turns arguing about whether or not the trope befits her.If enough people are interested in this, let's clean up the page! I've left commenting on so anyone with thoughts can share them. ![]() If no horizontal line is dividing two examples, it means they're sub-examples of a larger trope. They're organized alphabetically, with horizontal lines dividing individual tropes. I've compiled a list of the biggest issues here: ( ) but likely more exist. Now that the Fire Emblem series is moving on from the games she appears in, I thought it would be a good opportunity to go and clean up her page. The tl dr here is people who both like and dislike her are essentially using her character sheet as a vehicle to argue about her, so you get multiple trope examples that read like forum arguments, tropes being applied to her that don't fit at all, and occasional out of nowhere gripes about her in the middle of describing the tropes that do fit her. Perhaps unsurprisingly for a character as divisive as she is, the character page for Edelgard from Fire Emblem: Three Houses has become a mess over the three years since the game came out.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |